>overemphasized
>colours and intensities and loss of bounderies between inside and outside,
>and less cocain aesthetics of a networks of symbols, and a strong (dominant)
>ego having grandious plans.
>you find much more 'blured', indirect, subliminal, fluid and multivocal or
>decentralised  transformations of those supersigns.  best example might
>be the nike symbol. the brand name transports much more a process,
>an intensity then a leadership. (take intel, or microsoft - how lame!)


what would the aural equivalent of the nike/intel/microsoft symbol be?
i hear the apple signature every time i switch on my laptop

www - http://www.irational.org/tm
e1  - mailto:london@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
e2  - mailto:rachel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
tel - + 44 (0)171 272 5816







 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
(a) (c) (o) (u) (s) (t) (i) (c) ( ) (s) (p) (a) (c) (e)
 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
information&comunication channel | for net.broadcasters
http://xchange.re-lab.net  (Xchange)  net.audio network
xchange search/webarchive: http://xchange.re-lab.net/a/