okay people,  sorry for cutting into the discussin so harsh. I admit,  I
jumped the gun a bit.  I didnt mean to throw any elbows and I didnt mean to
direct my blurb to anyone in particular.

I understand the need for on-going discussion....but without any research
to back it up, it sort of goes soft.  ya know what I mean?  It seems like
some people have lost some enthusiasm alltogether.  Some of the most
interesting activity I remember where those that happened in january by the
radio students  the ozone stream, and convex tv.  check out messages 00063
- 77 in the archive (approx.).   I wasnt sitting on a line at that
time...but it read as if they were some active exchanges.

f writes....
     hmhm; looking through the xchange-mails of the last half year: it's
     half announcements of broad/webcasts; a quarter of the mails deals with
     technical stuff; 24 % may be discussion in the broadest sense; 1% is jokes
    (thanks a lot, j!). in short: where's the prob?

the prob lies in the fact that of the 50 percent of the castings that where
advertised, maybe 10% of those invited others to participate.  its great
that people are setting up shop and putting out streams...but there needs
to be more transactions between places.  more exchange.   Am I wrong on
this one?

In any case, it seems to me that there are many more similarities in our
arguments than there are differences.  We just seem to saying them in
different ways, and stressing different things.  I sure hope the symposium
in berlin yeilds some output.  maybe some orginizational schemes.


best  - august.









Pit,  your suggestion:  net.radio people together to get a window on an AM
frequency for a couple of
transmissions.
sound okay to me.  I know of a public station that will have an FM
frequency as of september.  ...and they seem to be quite interested in this
stuff.   there are probably some more out there as well.


Matt, while I´ll admit that it is probably one of the most natural things
in the world to use the words "art" and "lame-ass" in the same sentence, I
think we can all agree that all might go a lot smoother if we left art out
of the discussion for the time being at least.
And,  you think my "show" sucks.  Well, you got me there....cause it really
does.  Out of the 30 or so hours of radio that I´ve done in the past couple
months, about 1 hour was slightly interesting...and the rest were just
plain dorky.  But, to my defense, I have to say that it is equally valid to
make amateur radio as it is to make professional seamless radio.  You also
have to take into acount that the landscape on the frequency I am on is
just a CD changer playing cd`s 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
against this type of landscape, my stuff is at least a bit refreshing.  I
do my stuff live every week, and with no intention to record it as a
finished thing.  Plus, if we are going to squabble about the quality of
each others stuff...then it could be self-defeating.












 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
(a) (c) (o) (u) (s) (t) (i) (c) ( ) (s) (p) (a) (c) (e)
 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
information&comunication channel | for net.broadcasters
http://xchange.re-lab.net  (Xchange)  net.audio network
xchange search/webarchive: http://xchange.re-lab.net/a/